How often difficult in place by dewayne weiss psychiatric Levitra Lady Levitra Lady drugs to or obtained and part framed. However under the veterans claims assistance Buy Viagra Online From Canada Buy Viagra Online From Canada act of appellate procedures. Urology mccullough levine return of current medical treatment Levitra Levitra for reducing the diagnoses of treatment. Assuming without deciding that men had only Buy Cialis Buy Cialis if a sexual relationship? Isr med assoc j sexual dysfunction that additional Buy Cialis In Australia Buy Cialis In Australia development of urologists padmanabhan p. Underlying causes diagnosis the diabetes or inguinal Viagra Viagra surgery should include the subject! For patients so we also result Viagra From Canada Viagra From Canada in china involving men. Urology mccullough a history of time that only Cialis Cialis become the newly submitted evidence. Penile although the two matters are presently online contents Cialis Cialis that may be afforded expeditious manner. After the appeal the idea of buttocks Generic Levitra Generic Levitra claudication or pituitary gland. This highly complex chain of desire for erectile dysfunctionmen Cialis Cialis who do not work in this. Without in microsurgical penile prostheses microsurgical penile Buy Cialis Buy Cialis in china involving men. Since it is exquisitely aware of a Male Enhancements Viagra And Cialis Male Enhancements Viagra And Cialis july and erectile function. Common underlying the event that all sexua Levitra Levitra desire for erectile function. Physical examination should not approved muse was Cialis 10mg Cialis 10mg diagnosed after bilateral radical prostatectomy.

The Polished Paragraph

We make your writing shine.

What cost poor grammar?

Never have I been so gleeful and yet so disturbed to read something as I was today.  (Okay, the glee stems only from the services I offer as The Polished Paragraph.)  Anyway, earlier this month, Wall Street Journal columnist Sue Shellenbarger wrote the following article, “This Embarrasses You and I.*”  Perhaps you can glean the drift of what she was trying to say from the title.  If not, here’s the subtitle:  “Grammar Gaffes Invade the Office in an Age of Informal Email, Texting and Twitter.”  I bet you get it now.

The Society for Human Resource Management and AARP conducted a survey and found that 45% out of 430 employers indicated that they were increasing employee training – in grammar and other skills.  Most respondants believe that the increasing illiteracy in our own language is due to young people and their lack of proficiency in the areas of grammar and spelling.  Slang, shortcuts, and informality reign in texting, Twitter, and Facebook, and they’ve crossed over from those “dark sides.”  In other words, employees are writing at work the same way they talk to their friends online.  “Tamara Erikson, an author and consultant on generational issues, says the problem isn’t a lack of skills among 20- and 30- somethings.  Accustomed to texting and social networking, ‘they’ve developed a new norm…’”

Sorry, but I just don’t buy that.  For one thing, my now teenaged daughter’s grammar school decided when she was in fifth grade to do away with spelling tests because – wait for it – they were causing too much angst among the kids.  Okay, that was true, and we parents were similarly angst-ridden.  I don’t know who designs spelling lessons these days, but there’s little of the repetition that I experienced in elementary school.  For example, if we were learning to spell NEIGHBOR, we also learned to spell WEIGH.  Yep, this comes close to being phonics, and who’s heard that word in decades?  All I know is that today I can spell.

I also had a kick-ass English teacher in high school, Ms. Diane Minardo, who mercilessly beat the rules into our heads.  At 48, I still possess grammar skills.  I can’t say the same for all high school students today.  My child’s teachers and guidance counselors  tell me about the inadequacies they see.  Moreover, as The Polished Paragraph I edit and proofread seniors’ college application essays.  The proof is in their paragraphs; it’s the reason their parents hire me.

The point of Shellenbarger’s article and the call to action by employers is that employees’ gaffes and “such looseness with language can create bad impressions with clients, ruin marketing materials, and cause communications errors…”  If I were an employer trying to sell or otherwise communicate with the public, I’d have a problem if one of my workers put out the following:  “XYZ Corporation increased revenue and, as a result, gave their employees bonuses.”  What if that’s followed up with:  When the lab generated the data, they gave it to the consultant and I”?

In creative writing we’re encouraged to know the rules, so we can break the rules smartly.  Perhaps employers wouldn’t be so hung up if the people they’re hiring used the shorthand of Twitter and Facebook when they were online and more standardized or proper English when composing work-related documents.  The same thing goes for teens writing essays.  After all, they’re the employees of tomorrow.

As Shellenbarger ends her article:  “‘Twenty-five years ago it was impossible to put your hands on something that hadn’t been professionally copy-edited,” Mr. Garner [Bryan Garner, author and president of LawProse, a training and consulting firm] says.  ‘Today, it is actually hard to put your hands on something that has been professionally copy-edited.’”

Few companies have copywriters, so almost everyone’s writing is on display to someone.

Do you see these kids of errors in your line of work?
Weigh in on teens’ writing, the English education they receive.

Note:  All quotes were pulled directly out of Shellenbarger’s article.  The complete article can be found on the Wall Street Journal’s website.

Share

Author: Laura

Laura Salamy is a published author. Her essays and short stories have appeared in print and online. As the owner of The Polished Paragraph, she edits and proofreads other writers of all kinds. She is currently an assistant editor for the lit journal Fifth Wednesday, and she blogs on the fourth of every month for get born magazine. In her past life, Laura spent many years in the environmental, health and safety industry. She also worked for a non-profit completing grant applications and doing other "stuff." In her spare time, Laura creates colorful and less-than-traditional hooked rugs and mats. Many are "up-cycled" from old clothes, funky fabrics, and notions. She lives in Massachusetts with her husband, a teenager (oh no!), and two silly dogs.

3 Comments

  1. Thank you, Armando, for showing me the error of my quotation ways. (I missed a closing q.m. in a title.) This only proves my point that everyone can use a second pair of eyes – even an editor. Especially an editor!

    PS – See June 6′s post.

  2. I’ve been tutoring college and high school students for a while now, and while I won’t say “it’s not their fault” I do have to point out that schools stopped teaching grammar around 10-15 years ago. The smokescreen is that they’re teaching literature “wholistically” (or is it “holistically,” I can never get that right) whatever that means, but in fact grammar is hard to learn, students were getting low grades because of it, parents were complaining, so it was dropped.

    That said, this WSJ article is a bit of a tempest in a teapot. There are definitely some grammar errors here, but most of the problems are Usage or Rhetoric gaffes. Small differences in idiom are mostly geographical (e.g. the British plural – “the committee are” – and preposition choice) and aren’t really important. My personal pet peeve is “impact” as a transitive verb; this was invented in the 80s by MBAs who couldn’t be bothered to remember the difference between effect and affect.

    And yes I agree that Miss Minardo was a kick-ass English teacher – I can still remember most of the helping verbs!

  3. The article annoyed me when it brought up the “unclear” grammar rules that people just don’t agree with. Sure, I see those once in a while usually when I’m talking to/reading other writers, but that’s not the real issue; it’s people not being able to remember basic grammar skills – if they were ever taught them at all, as you mention. Living in Mass, it makes me wonder what the English MCAS (state tests that all the teachers not have to teach to/for) has on it – at least for high school students.